
It’s a new year, and I am happy to see it.
I filled up my old sketchbook in a somewhat timely manner so as to be able to start a fresh one on the first day of 2012. I even added a new pencil and eraser.
A blank page is hard enough, but the first blank page in a brand new sketchbook … well words like honour, reverence, trepidation come to mind. Still, you have to just dive in, and for some reason the phrase “sleeps with the fishes” drifted into my mind while I was drawing.
This, in and of itself, is why it is good to draw from your imagination. Because you never know what you might be thinking and to borrow from Joan Didion’s 1976 essay on Why I Write, "I write entirely to find out what I’m thinking, what I’m looking at, what I see and what it means."
Therefore, it is of no great surprise to me that I took a blind left turn only to end up drawing a sleepy fish instead of creating a Godfather-like-thug- whacking illustration. To be honest, I know myself well enough not only to trust those left turns, but also to count on them. It makes my life interesting and allows me to see my thoughts even when I begin with a starkly blank white page.


Art on Steroids
August 8th, 2011I recently listened to a 60 Minutes podcast reporting that Lance Armstrong "allegedly" used performance enhancing drugs in order to win the Tour de France races. The basic premise of the story was that a cyclist had to blood-dope – because everyone else was – if he even wanted to possibly have a chance at winning. And if he didn’t? Well, forget it.
We have this too in the visual art world.
At a recent art show, I was once again reminded to what lengths an "artist" will go to produce salable artwork. At the show there was an "artist" there who painted on top of a photograph to create realistic looking animals. I believe this to be a performance enhancing art aid. A photo is taken, sent to a printer and printed on canvas. The "artist" then adds paint and sells it as if it were an original piece of art in the traditional realm of high realism.
I mentioned this technique to a 13 year old student of mine. He said, "Don’t they know that’s cheating?" and "So it’s about the product and not the process for them right?" Right.
Before I get into why this technique is wrong, I would like to mention that photography does have its place in the visual arts either as photography or as reference material for visual arts and illustration. But when an artist blurs those lines for the sake of making money, there are several issues:
I am incensed by the nature of this type of work and by the "artists" who practice this procedure. I just don’t understand why these so-called artists wouldn’t want to learn – truly learn – how to paint and draw well.
As always, comments are welcome.